What I have published and then taken back

This is not a completeness certificate. It is the mistakes I caught, which is a lower bound on the mistakes I made. What it says is that when a figure fails it comes down, and the removal is published rather than edited away.

4 of the 13 left nothing in their place, so the field is empty now and the platform is worse described than it looked before. The other 9 were replaced: 8 with figures read off the platform's own logged-in checkout, and 1 with a figure that is better than what it replaced and still not a current checkout reading.

Figures

  1. Amateur.TVPackage prices
    100 units/$9.99, 300/$27.99, 600/$53.99, 1300/$109.99 and 2800/$224.99.replaced, and the field holds a checkout reading now
    The sirentola ladder Xcams was cleared of. It is not Amateur.TV's either: $2.99 buys 2,000, not 100.Back if: Nothing restores these. They are not a stale reading of Amateur.TV, they are a ladder with no subject. What replaced them was read at the checkout.
  2. BabestationBilling model
    Credits denominated in GBP, with one credit pegged at GBP 0.10.replaced, and the field holds a checkout reading now
    The peg was inferred from one coupon-site membership blurb. The ladder prices a Babecoin at $0.135.Back if: Babestation stating a peg itself. It does not; what the checkout gives is a flat ladder, which implies a rate without declaring one, so `unitValueNative` stays null rather than holding a figure this site worked out.
  3. BabestationPackage prices
    100 credits/GBP 10, 200/GBP 20, 500/GBP 50, 1000 with 500 bonus/GBP 100, and 2000 with 1000 bonus/GBP 200.replaced, and the field holds a checkout reading now
    The bonus on the top two tiers was the new-user offer counted twice. It applies to all five, once.Back if: A reading from a UK account, which is where the pound prices would come from if Babestation still prices that way for British buyers. My 2022 reading was in pounds and this one is in dollars; those may be two currencies for two countries rather than a change, and one account cannot tell which.
  4. CAM4Package prices
    Nine tiers. Five card: 50 tokens/$9.95, 150/$18.99, 300/$44.95, 550/$84.95 and 1050/$159.99. Four crypto: 140/$20.99, 275/$46.95, 500/$86.95 and 950/$161.99.replaced, and the field holds a checkout reading now
    Every card rung wrong at the checkout: $9.95 buys 58 tokens, not 50. The crypto four came from the same source.Back if: Opening CAM4's crypto top-up path with an account and reading those tiers off it. The card rail was read on 2026-09-02 and the crypto rail was not; nothing here says the crypto tiers do not exist, only that the source that supplied them was wrong everywhere it could be checked.
  5. Cams.comPackage prices
    200 units/$19.99, 500/$49.99, 1100/$99.99, 2700/$199.99 and 5800/$399.99.replaced, and the field holds a checkout reading now
    A sirentola import in the wrong currency. The checkout prices in euros and the amounts do not match.Back if: A reading from a US account, which is where dollar prices would come from if Cams.com still charges them. The 2022 reading was in dollars and this one is in euros; that is more likely two countries than a change, and one account cannot tell.
  6. CooMeetPackage prices
    10 minutes/$5, 60 minutes/$25 and 360 minutes/$100.emptied, and nothing stands there
    Read off CooMeet's help pages, not its checkout. The checkout sells periods, and no minute pack at all.Back if: Finding the minute packs at the checkout rather than in the help copy. They may still exist behind a path I did not open; what is certain is that they are not what CooMeet sells on the page it takes money on.
  7. XloveCamPackage prices
    100 credits/$10, 250/$23, 525/$46, 1100/$92 and 2500/$200.replaced, and the field holds a checkout reading now
    A sirentola import, not a reading. The checkout sells dollar denominations and counts no credits at all.Back if: The credit count beside a tier at the checkout, if XLoveCam ever prints one. Until then the entry price is the honest fact and the per-credit price does not exist as a number anybody can read.
  8. JerkmatePrivate rate and band
    8-12 gold/min, typical 10 gold/min, and gold is pegged 1:1 to USD, so it read as $10.00 a minuteemptied, and nothing stands there
    Wrong in shape, not just in value: a house rate on a platform where performers set the price.Back if: A room sample. Jerkmate shows a per-minute price on the room tiles in the grid, so 30 rooms can be read without opening any of them or holding an account, into _audit/rates/jerkmate.csv, then npm run ingest:rates. This is the highest-value sample on the board: it carries five roulette pages, and since Chatmate was removed those pages have no ranked alternative until it lands.
  9. LiveJasminTypical private rate
    1.99 credits/minemptied, and nothing stands there
    A midpoint, not a measurement, on a platform that had never said who sets its prices.Back if: A room sample: 30 rooms into _audit/rates/livejasmin.csv, then npm run ingest:rates. That writes percentiles with an n, a date and a method attached, which is the only shape a performer-set rate can honestly take.
  10. MyDirtyHobbyTypical private rate
    150 DirtyCents/min (about EUR 1.87)emptied, and nothing stands there
    The exact midpoint of the file's own published 99-199 band, recorded because a source called it the average.Back if: Either finding a published house rate at the checkout, which would make the model `fixed` and the figure real; or, if performers set their own price, a room sample through scripts/ingest-rates.mjs. MyDirtyHobby bills in EUR, so neither puts it in the calculator. This is about what the review page states, not about coverage.
  11. StripchatPackage prices
    1100 tokens/$96.99, 6200/$499.99 and 12570/$999.99, the top three rungs of a ten-tier ladderreplaced, and the field holds a checkout reading now
    Not at the logged-in checkout at any price. Seven third-party pages agreed with each other and with nothing else.Back if: Opening the checkout's "How to get larger packages" link, which is where tiers above 2,350 live and which I did not open. If large tiers exist, that is where they are, but they are not the three that were on file.
  12. StripchatWelcome offer
    50 free tokens on signupreplaced, and the field holds a checkout reading now
    Not at the logged-in checkout and not offered on registration. It came from affiliate promo pages.Back if: Seeing 50 tokens land in a new account without a purchase. Nothing short of that, because the claim is specifically about money not changing hands.
  13. XcamsPackage prices
    100 credits/$9.99, 300/$27.99, 600/$53.99, 1300/$109.99, 2800/$224.99replaced, and the field holds a checkout reading now
    Byte-identical to Amateur.TV's ladder: one import wrote both files, and two files agreeing read as two sources.Back if: The euro ladder read off the live checkout today. What stands here now is my own 2022 reading of that same checkout, better than the withdrawn figure in every respect that matters (right currency, right operator, an author, a date) and still four years old.

13 figures across 11 platforms · generated from the withdrawn record on each platform file

Sentences

A wrong number came out of a spreadsheet somebody else filled in. A wrong sentence is me telling a reader something I had not checked. Each is quoted exactly as published, because paraphrasing the error in kinder words is a correction nobody can hold against the original.

  1. I would rather the page carried a price before it carried a commission. That order is the whole argument of this site, and easier to state than to keep, so it is stated here where it can be checked: if a button appears above before a number does, the order broke.

    /sinparty-review/ ·

    The affiliate link went on before any price did, which is the order this sentence promised not to use.
    It was true then and is not now
  2. hit the button below, make an account with your best email, confirm it and you’ll get 10 free BongaCams tokens straight away

    /bongacams-review/ ·

    welcomeBonus has been null throughout, so the page promised a grant the dataset does not hold.Settled by: Registering a new account, confirming the email, and looking at the token balance before any purchase. If 10 tokens are there, it goes in welcomeBonus with the date; if they are not, this becomes a retraction of a claim that was wrong when written. Nothing short of that settles it, because the claim is specifically about money not changing hands. That is the same test recorded against Stripchat’s withdrawn 50-token offer.
    I cannot tell which
  3. Make sure to click the links on this article or the picture below and get your free 50 Cam4 tokens now and start chatting with some of the most beautiful girls on the planet live on camera.

    /cam4-review/ ·

    Promised free tokens four times over a welcomeBonus that has been null throughout.
    It was never true
  4. Paying with crypto will save you some money if you decide to pay for private shows and Cam2Cam and tipping.

    /cam4-review/ ·

    The only crypto ladder here points the other way: crypto costs 18.4% more per token than the card rail.Settled by: One logged-in session at CAM4's token checkout, reading the card ladder and the crypto ladder in the same sitting, with the transaction fee noted on each. That settles the direction today. Whether it was true in 2022 is a separate question and probably unanswerable, because my own review of that date priced only the card rail, so there is no crypto figure from the period to compare against, and I would rather record that than guess at it.
    I cannot tell which
  5. The average token price is between a range from $2 to $6 per minute which is quite ok overall but worth it

    /cams-com-review/ ·

    Calls a per-minute rate a token price, and the file holds no private rate at all.Settled by: Open two or three rooms and read the private rate off them. That settles the rate model first, meaning whether every performer shows the same price or their own, and a room sample after it produces a median. Both need an account, because Cams.com does not show prices to a logged-out visitor.
    I cannot tell which
  6. the fact that some shows start from 6 tokens per minute is definitely something to consider as a big thumb up

    /camsoda-review/ ·

    Nothing here supports 6 tokens a minute. The published band is 60 to 120.Settled by: A room sample: thirty private rates read off the default grid, recorded into _audit/rates/camsoda.csv with the date and the count, then ingested. That produces a median rather than a band and would show directly whether anything on the platform is priced near 6 tokens a minute. Whether such rooms existed in 2022 is a separate question that no sample taken today can answer.
    I cannot tell which
  7. All you need to do is to click on the links in this article, use your best email and confirm it to get your $10 free ImLive credit right now.

    /imlive-review/ ·

    welcomeBonus has been null throughout, so the page promised a grant the dataset does not hold.
    It was never true
  8. Buying credits is very simple and secure and they are accepting credit cards and cryptocurrency. All the top credit cards are accepted and if you buy with crypto you will get an additional discount

    /mydirtyhobby-review/ ·

    The file holds one ladder on one rail and no crypto ladder at all, discounted or otherwise.Settled by: One logged-in session at the MyDirtyHobby top-up page, reading the tier prices with a card selected and then with crypto selected, in the same sitting. If the crypto column is cheaper it is a real finding and belongs in packages with a method rail, exactly as CAM4 carries its two. If it is not, this becomes a retraction of a claim that was wrong when written.
    I cannot tell which
  9. the credit card processor is safe and encrypted and secure as well, you will never be charged if you don’t buy tokens yourself

    /myfreecams-review/ ·

    I have never audited a payment processor. It is a claim about what I knew, and it was not true.
    It was never true
  10. on average a model wants 20 tokens per minute for a private show

    /soulcams-review/ ·

    Two different averages for the same quantity, four paragraphs apart on one page.Settled by: Open thirty rooms and write down the private rate on each. SoulCams shows the rate on the room tile, so this needs an account but no purchase, and it produces a median rather than an average of two guesses.
    I cannot tell which

10 sentences · generated from retractedClaims on each platform file

Why this page cannot quietly go out of date

Every row is stored on the platform's own data file next to the field it is about, and this page is generated from those files at build time. Restore a withdrawn figure without deleting its record and the build fails. What none of that can do is find the errors. That is still a person opening a checkout. See what I have verified for the other half: not what came down, but what was never up.