What I have published and then taken back

This is not a completeness certificate. It is the mistakes I caught, which is a lower bound on the mistakes I made. What it says is that when a figure fails it comes down, and the removal is published rather than edited away.

18 of the 40 left nothing in their place, so the field is empty now and the platform is worse described than it looked before. The other 22 were replaced: 21 with figures read off the platform's own logged-in checkout, and 1 with a figure that is better than what it replaced and still not a current checkout reading.

Figures

  1. BabestationFree chat
    true (free chat)emptied, and nothing stands there
    Logged out on 2026-09-26, Babestation walled its rooms behind age verification, from where this site reads.Back if: A logged-out reading, from any country, that reaches a Babestation room playing with no account, recorded by capture:catalogue --room; the page would then say where the reading was valid.Note, 26 September 2026: the tool named here was retired that day, and this site makes no automated requests to a platform. A reading by hand, taken the way any visitor would, now meets this condition.
  2. CamSodaFree chat
    true (free chat)emptied, and nothing stands there
    Logged out on 2026-09-26, a CamSoda room asked for age verification first, from where this site reads.Back if: A logged-out reading from the same place that reaches a CamSoda room playing with no verification, recorded by capture:catalogue --room.Note, 26 September 2026: the tool named here was retired that day, and this site makes no automated requests to a platform. A reading by hand, taken the way any visitor would, now meets this condition.
  3. ChaturbateFree chat
    true (free chat, a room measured playing at 08:34 UTC on 2026-09-26)emptied, and nothing stands there
    A room played at 08:34 UTC; by 13:41 UTC the same day, from the same place, every room asked for age verification.Back if: A logged-out reading from the same place that reaches a Chaturbate room playing with no verification, recorded by capture:catalogue --room.Note, 26 September 2026: the tool named here was retired that day, and this site makes no automated requests to a platform. A reading by hand, taken the way any visitor would, now meets this condition.
  4. DXLiveFree chat
    true (free chat)emptied, and nothing stands there
    Logged out on 2026-09-26, a DXLive room asked for age verification first, from where this site reads.Back if: A logged-out reading from the same place that reaches a DXLive room playing with no verification, recorded by capture:catalogue --room.Note, 26 September 2026: the tool named here was retired that day, and this site makes no automated requests to a platform. A reading by hand, taken the way any visitor would, now meets this condition.
  5. FapChatFree chat
    true (free chat)emptied, and nothing stands there
    Logged out, fapchat.com offered no room: every tile and button leaves the site for an affiliate tracker.Back if: A reading, logged out or with a free account, that reaches a public room on a domain on record as FapChat's own and records it playing with capture:catalogue --room.Note, 26 September 2026: the tool named here was retired that day, and this site makes no automated requests to a platform. A reading by hand, taken the way any visitor would, now meets this condition.
  6. FlingsterFree chat
    true (free chat)emptied, and nothing stands there
    Logged out on 2026-09-23, Start Chatting opened a sign-up form: no chat without signing up.Back if: A logged-out reading that reaches Flingster's random video chat with no sign-up, recorded with capture:catalogue.Note, 26 September 2026: the tool named here was retired that day, and this site makes no automated requests to a platform. A reading by hand, taken the way any visitor would, now meets this condition.
  7. JerkmateFree chat
    true (free chat, a room measured playing by 12:05 UTC on 2026-09-26)emptied, and nothing stands there
    A room played by 12:05 UTC; at 13:42 UTC the same day, from the same place, rooms asked visitors to join first.Back if: A logged-out reading from the same place that reaches a Jerkmate room playing with no sign-up, recorded by capture:catalogue --room.Note, 26 September 2026: the tool named here was retired that day, and this site makes no automated requests to a platform. A reading by hand, taken the way any visitor would, now meets this condition.
  8. LiveJasminFree chat
    true (free chat)emptied, and nothing stands there
    Logged out on 2026-09-26, a LiveJasmin room asked for age verification first, from where this site reads.Back if: A logged-out reading from the same place that reaches a LiveJasmin room playing with no verification, recorded by capture:catalogue --room.Note, 26 September 2026: the tool named here was retired that day, and this site makes no automated requests to a platform. A reading by hand, taken the way any visitor would, now meets this condition.
  9. MyFreeCamsFree chat
    true (free chat)emptied, and nothing stands there
    Logged out on 2026-09-26, a MyFreeCams room asked for an account and age verification to watch.Back if: A logged-out reading, from any country, that reaches a MyFreeCams room playing with no account, recorded by capture:catalogue --room; the page would then say where the reading was valid.Note, 26 September 2026: the tool named here was retired that day, and this site makes no automated requests to a platform. A reading by hand, taken the way any visitor would, now meets this condition.
  10. OleCamsFree chat
    true (free chat)emptied, and nothing stands there
    Logged out on 2026-09-26, a OleCams room asked for an account first, from where this site reads.Back if: A logged-out reading from the same place that reaches a OleCams room playing with no account, recorded by capture:catalogue --room.Note, 26 September 2026: the tool named here was retired that day, and this site makes no automated requests to a platform. A reading by hand, taken the way any visitor would, now meets this condition.
  11. SinPartyFree chat
    true (free chat)emptied, and nothing stands there
    Logged out on 2026-09-26, a SinParty room asked for age verification first, from where this site reads.Back if: A logged-out reading from the same place that reaches a SinParty room playing with no verification, recorded by capture:catalogue --room.Note, 26 September 2026: the tool named here was retired that day, and this site makes no automated requests to a platform. A reading by hand, taken the way any visitor would, now meets this condition.
  12. Amateur.TVPackage prices
    10,000 units/$15.95 on the card rail, the second of five tiers.replaced by the checkout reading of
    $15.95 was the struck-through "before" price. The card is charged $9.98 for 10,000 coins.Back if: Nothing restores it. $15.95 is the comparison price printed beside the real one, not a price any card is charged.
  13. BongaCamsPackage prices
    76 tokens/$4.99, 156/$9.99, 462/$24.99, 984/$49.99, 1,480/$74.99 and 50,800/$2,500.replaced by the checkout reading of
    A sirentola import. No rail on the logged-in page sells $4.99 or $9.99; card sells 134 tokens for $10.Back if: Nothing restores these. They were not a stale reading of a real ladder; no rail on the purchase page has ever been shown to sell them.
  14. CAM4Package prices
    58 tokens/$9.95, 115/$18.99, 288/$47.95, 575/$90.95 and 1,000/$172.95 on the card rail, recorded as the standing ladder.replaced by the checkout reading of
    The counts included a first-purchase +15%, and $2 is added per purchase. The standing card ladder is 50 to 1,000.Back if: Nothing: the 58 is real and belongs to a first purchase. It is recorded now as the welcome offer, which is where it was always true.
  15. CamSodaPackage prices
    100 tokens/$12, 250/$27.50, 550/$54.99, 1,100/$99.99 and 2,500/$199.99.replaced by the checkout reading of
    A sirentola ladder. One rung is real and only on PayPal; card sells 100 tokens for $10.99, not $12.Back if: Nothing restores these. Only one of the five appears on the purchase page, on one rail, and it is recorded there.
  16. ChatmatePrivate rate and band
    4.99 GOLD/min as min, typical and max, and GOLD is pegged 1:1 to USD, so it read as $4.99 a minuteemptied, and nothing stands there
    A house rate on Streamate's rooms, where each performer sets the per-minute price. Withdrawn, not re-read.Back if: The per-minute price read off Chatmate's own room list, in gold a minute, as a band or a room sample; or Chatmate showing a house rate that overrides its performers' own.
  17. ChatmateWho sets the private price
    fixedreplaced, by a record that is not a checkout reading
    Chatmate sells Streamate's rooms, and on Streamate each performer sets their own per-minute rate.Back if: Chatmate showing one house rate that every performer charges, on its own room list.
  18. ChaturbatePackage prices
    200 tokens/$20.99, 500/$44.99, 750/$62.99 and 2,025/$159.99, beside 100/$10.99 and 1,000/$79.99.replaced by the checkout reading of
    Four of six rungs are not on the purchase page. Card sells 100, 400 and 1,000 tokens, and 400 was never on file.Back if: The four rungs appearing on Chaturbate's own purchase page again. Three of them were in the 2024 review, so they are not invented; they are not sold on the page today.
  19. Flirt4FreePackage prices
    90/$10, 190/$20, 495/$50, 1,035/$100, 2,700/$250, 5,625/$500 credits.emptied, and nothing stands there
    A sirentola ladder. The logged-in page sold $20, $40 and $80 packs, and $20 bought 240 credits, not 190.Back if: Reading Flirt4Free's standing credit ladder, the one a buyer sees after the first purchase, at its own Buy Credits page.
  20. ImLiveBilling model
    Credits pegged at 1 credit = 1 USD.replaced by the checkout reading of
    No peg: 25 credits cost $29.95 on card, about $1.20 each, and $1.28 on PayPal.Back if: ImLive stating a peg itself. The ladder implies a price per credit without declaring one, so `unitValueNative` stays null.
  21. ImLivePackage prices
    15 credits + 10 bonus for $15, 25 + 25 for $25, 50 + 50 for $50 and 100 + 100 for $100.replaced by the checkout reading of
    The 2022 ladder. Today 25 credits cost $29.95, and the extra 40 per cent is on a first purchase only.Back if: Nothing: it was the 2022 checkout, and the 2026 one is different at every rung.
  22. ImLivePrivate rate and band
    2-5 credits/min (1 credit = 1 USD)emptied, and nothing stands there
    A dollar band recorded in credits under a peg that does not exist. The unit it was quoted in is now unknown.Back if: Reading the per-minute price off ImLive's own room tiles, with the unit it is printed in.
  23. LiveJasminPackage prices
    28 credits/$18.00, 68/$40.00, 98/$56.50 and 158/$89.50, all plus tax.replaced by the checkout reading of
    Neither contested set was right. 17.99 credits cost $27.99 on card, about $1.56 a credit.Back if: Nothing restores these. Neither the counts nor the prices are on the package page on any rail.
  24. MyFreeCamsPackage prices
    100 tokens/$10.99, 400/$39.99, 550/$49.99, 900/$74.99, 1,875/$149.99, 3,775/$299.99 and 7,575/$599.99, beside 200/$19.99.replaced by the checkout reading of
    The purchase page sells one package, 200 tokens for $19.99. The other seven tiers are not on it.Back if: The tiers appearing on MyFreeCams' own Purchase Tokens page. Three were in the 2022 review, so they are not invented; they are not sold on the page today.
  25. StripchatPackage prices
    765 tokens/$69.99, 1,350/$119.99 and 2,350/$199.99, the top three of seven default tiers.replaced by the checkout reading of
    The purchase page read on 2026-09-13 shows four tiers, topping out at 540 tokens for $49.99.Back if: The three tiers appearing on Stripchat's own Buy tokens page again, or behind its "How to get larger packages" link, which was not opened on either day.
  26. XcamsPackage prices
    40 credits for EUR 9.99, 80/19.99, 220/49.99, 460/99.99 and 1,000/199.99.replaced by the checkout reading of
    The 2022 euro ladder. The 2026 page starts at 52 credits for EUR 15.99 and no rung is the same.Back if: Nothing: it was the 2022 checkout, and the 2026 one differs at every rung.
  27. Amateur.TVPackage prices
    100 units/$9.99, 300/$27.99, 600/$53.99, 1300/$109.99 and 2800/$224.99.replaced by the checkout reading of
    The sirentola ladder Xcams was cleared of. It is not Amateur.TV's either: $2.99 buys 2,000, not 100.Back if: Nothing restores these. They are not a stale reading of Amateur.TV, they are a ladder with no subject. What replaced them was read at the checkout.
  28. BabestationBilling model
    Credits denominated in GBP, with one credit pegged at GBP 0.10.replaced by the checkout reading of
    The peg was inferred from one coupon-site membership blurb. The ladder prices a Babecoin at $0.135.Back if: Babestation stating a peg itself. It does not; what the checkout gives is a flat ladder, which implies a rate without declaring one, so `unitValueNative` stays null rather than holding a figure this site worked out.
  29. BabestationPackage prices
    100 credits/GBP 10, 200/GBP 20, 500/GBP 50, 1000 with 500 bonus/GBP 100, and 2000 with 1000 bonus/GBP 200.replaced by the checkout reading of
    The bonus on the top two tiers was the new-user offer counted twice. It applies to all five, once.Back if: A reading from a UK account, which is where the pound prices would come from if Babestation still prices that way for British buyers. My 2022 reading was in pounds and this one is in dollars; those may be two currencies for two countries rather than a change, and one account cannot tell which.
  30. BabestationPrivate rate and band
    50 credits a minute for a private, recorded as a bare midpoint with min and max both null.replaced by the checkout reading of
    The house rate is 60 Babecoins a minute, not 50. The 50 was a 2022 reading nobody had been back to.Back if: A Babestation room showing 50 Babecoins a minute again on a funded account. The 50 was read off this site’s own 2022 review rather than off the platform, so nothing in an archive settles it: it needs a meter.
  31. CAM4Package prices
    Nine tiers. Five card: 50 tokens/$9.95, 150/$18.99, 300/$44.95, 550/$84.95 and 1050/$159.99. Four crypto: 140/$20.99, 275/$46.95, 500/$86.95 and 950/$161.99.replaced by the checkout reading of
    Every card rung wrong at the checkout: $9.95 buys 58 tokens, not 50. The crypto four came from the same source.Back if: Opening CAM4's crypto top-up path with an account and reading those tiers off it. The card rail was read on 2026-09-02 and the crypto rail was not; nothing here says the crypto tiers do not exist, only that the source that supplied them was wrong everywhere it could be checked.
  32. Cams.comPackage prices
    200 units/$19.99, 500/$49.99, 1100/$99.99, 2700/$199.99 and 5800/$399.99.replaced by the checkout reading of
    A sirentola import in the wrong currency. The checkout prices in euros and the amounts do not match.Back if: A reading from a US account, which is where dollar prices would come from if Cams.com still charges them. The 2022 reading was in dollars and this one is in euros; that is more likely two countries than a change, and one account cannot tell.
  33. CooMeetPackage prices
    10 minutes/$5, 60 minutes/$25 and 360 minutes/$100.emptied, and nothing stands there
    Read off CooMeet's help pages, not its checkout. The checkout sells periods, and no minute pack at all.Back if: Finding the minute packs at the checkout rather than in the help copy. They may still exist behind a path I did not open; what is certain is that they are not what CooMeet sells on the page it takes money on.
  34. XloveCamPackage prices
    100 credits/$10, 250/$23, 525/$46, 1100/$92 and 2500/$200.replaced by the checkout reading of
    A sirentola import, not a reading. The checkout sells dollar denominations and counts no credits at all.Back if: The credit count beside a tier at the checkout, if XLoveCam ever prints one. Until then the entry price is the honest fact and the per-credit price does not exist as a number anybody can read.
  35. JerkmatePrivate rate and band
    8-12 gold/min, typical 10 gold/min, and gold is pegged 1:1 to USD, so it read as $10.00 a minuteemptied, and nothing stands there
    Wrong in shape, not just in value: a house rate on a platform where performers set the price.Back if: A room sample. Jerkmate shows a per-minute price on the room tiles in the grid, so 30 rooms can be read without opening any of them or holding an account, into _audit/rates/jerkmate.csv, then npm run ingest:rates. This is the highest-value sample on the board: it carries five roulette pages, and since Chatmate was removed those pages have no ranked alternative until it lands.
  36. LiveJasminTypical private rate
    1.99 credits/minemptied, and nothing stands there
    A midpoint, not a measurement, on a platform that had never said who sets its prices.Back if: A room sample: 30 rooms into _audit/rates/livejasmin.csv, then npm run ingest:rates. That writes percentiles with an n, a date and a method attached, which is the only shape a performer-set rate can honestly take.
  37. MyDirtyHobbyTypical private rate
    150 DirtyCents/min (about EUR 1.87)emptied, and nothing stands there
    The exact midpoint of the file's own published 99-199 band, recorded because a source called it the average.Back if: Either finding a published house rate at the checkout, which would make the model `fixed` and the figure real; or, if performers set their own price, a room sample through scripts/ingest-rates.mjs. MyDirtyHobby bills in EUR, so neither puts it in the calculator. This is about what the review page states, not about coverage.
  38. StripchatPackage prices
    1100 tokens/$96.99, 6200/$499.99 and 12570/$999.99, the top three rungs of a ten-tier ladderreplaced by the checkout reading of
    Not at the logged-in checkout at any price. Seven third-party pages agreed with each other and with nothing else.Back if: Opening the checkout's "How to get larger packages" link, which is where tiers above 2,350 live and which I did not open. If large tiers exist, that is where they are, but they are not the three that were on file.
  39. StripchatWelcome offer
    50 free tokens on signupreplaced by the checkout reading of
    Not at the logged-in checkout and not offered on registration. It came from affiliate promo pages.Back if: Seeing 50 tokens land in a new account without a purchase. Nothing short of that, because the claim is specifically about money not changing hands.
  40. XcamsPackage prices
    100 credits/$9.99, 300/$27.99, 600/$53.99, 1300/$109.99, 2800/$224.99replaced by the checkout reading of
    Byte-identical to Amateur.TV's ladder: one import wrote both files, and two files agreeing read as two sources.Back if: The euro ladder read off the live checkout today. What stands here now is my own 2022 reading of that same checkout, better than the withdrawn figure in every respect that matters (right currency, right operator, an author, a date) and still four years old.

40 figures across 23 platforms · generated from the withdrawn record on each platform file

Sentences

A wrong number came out of a spreadsheet somebody else filled in. A wrong sentence is me telling a reader something I had not checked. Each is quoted exactly as published, because paraphrasing the error in kinder words is a correction nobody can hold against the original.

  1. Cam Sites You Can Watch Free

    the page's title, as a browser tab and a search result show it, /free-cam-sites/ ·

    The search-result title made the same promise as the heading, over rows nobody had read.
    It was never true
  2. The cam sites you can actually watch for free

    the page's heading, /free-cam-sites/ ·

    It promised every row had been checked; seven of sixteen had no reading, four resting only on a 2022 review.
    It was never true
  3. Public chat is free and real, but the roster is small by the standards of the token sites and the good performers spend a lot of their evening in private.

    /babestation-review/ ·

    From where this site reads, Babestation's rooms sit behind an age-verification wall (2026-09-26).Settled by: A logged-out reading from a UK vantage point, where Babestation's audience is, recorded with capture:catalogue --room.Note, 26 September 2026: this site's readings stay local, by its own rule. What settles this is a reading by hand from where this site reads, not from another country.Note, 26 September 2026: the tool named here was retired that day, and this site makes no automated requests to a platform. A reading by hand, taken the way any visitor would, now meets this condition.
    I cannot tell which
  4. Public chat is free, and there is no card wall in front of it.

    /fapchat/ ·

    fapchat.com offers a logged-out visitor no room at all; every route leaves the site for an affiliate tracker.Settled by: An archived capture of fapchat.com from 2023 showing either a public room reachable from its own pages (the sentence became wrong) or the same off-site funnel (it was wrong when written).
    I cannot tell which
  5. [Flingster](/blog/flingster-review/) is the free version of that shape.

    /coomeet-review/ ·

    Flingster is not free to a visitor: its chat sits behind a sign-up form (read 2026-09-23).
    It was never true
  6. The random video chat underneath it is free, needs no card, and is not metered before or after you pay.

    /flingster-review/ ·

    A visitor cannot reach Flingster's chat without signing up; 'free' is Flingster's claim, unverified here.Settled by: An archived capture of flingster.com from May 2022 showing a logged-out visitor reaching the random chat with no sign-up (it became wrong) or the same sign-up form (it was wrong when written).
    I cannot tell which
  7. Try the free tier first. It is genuinely usable, and if the unfiltered experience is tolerable to you, the plan is money you do not need to spend.

    /flingster-review/ ·

    There is no free tier a visitor can try without signing up; what a member gets is unverified.Settled by: An archived capture of flingster.com from May 2022 showing a logged-out visitor reaching the random chat with no sign-up (it became wrong) or the same sign-up form (it was wrong when written).
    I cannot tell which
  8. It is a booking and billing layer on top of Skype

    /skyprivate-review/ ·

    Described SkyPrivate as a layer on Skype, after Skype had closed.
    It was never true
  9. SkyPrivate Review: Pay-per-Minute on Skype

    /skyprivate-review/ ·

    The title said the calls happen on Skype. They happen on Teams, Discord and Telegram.
    It was never true
  10. SkyPrivate sells pay-per-minute private calls over Skype rather than a browser.

    /skyprivate-review/ ·

    The description said the calls happen over Skype. They happen on Teams, Discord and Telegram.
    It was never true
  11. You need a Skype account, you need the SkyPrivate extension or app running

    /skyprivate-review/ ·

    Told readers they need a Skype account and an extension. Skype no longer exists.
    It was never true
  12. Its browse grid renders logged out and its rooms do not, which is where the question actually lives.

    /streamate-review/ ·

    Said the rooms do not load logged out. Nobody had entered one.Settled by: A public Streamate room that plays with no account, recorded as `catalogue.access.room: "open"` with the page text under _audit/catalogue/ and a screenshot showing the stream; or a recorded observation from inside a room, on an account with no card, of what plays before a private. The 2026-09-24 capture met an account wall at the room and settles neither: a sign-up wall says nothing about what is behind it.
    I cannot tell which
  13. so all I will say is that nothing about the billing model suggests an evening's worth.

    /streamate-review/ ·

    Implied the free layer is thin, on a page that says it never checked the free layer.Settled by: A public Streamate room that plays with no account, recorded as `catalogue.access.room: "open"` with the page text under _audit/catalogue/ and a screenshot showing the stream; or a recorded observation from inside a room, on an account with no card, of what plays before a private. The 2026-09-24 capture met an account wall at the room and settles neither: a sign-up wall says nothing about what is behind it.
    I cannot tell which
  14. Wrong platform if you want to watch for free. The whole billing model here starts the meter at the door, the same reason it is easy to budget on.

    /streamate-review/ ·

    Told readers who want to watch free to leave, on a platform whose free chat was never checked.Settled by: A public Streamate room that plays with no account, recorded as `catalogue.access.room: "open"` with the page text under _audit/catalogue/ and a screenshot showing the stream; or a recorded observation from inside a room, on an account with no card, of what plays before a private. The 2026-09-24 capture met an account wall at the room and settles neither: a sign-up wall says nothing about what is behind it.
    I cannot tell which
  15. The ladder runs backwards: the 150-token pack is cheaper per token than the three above it, so a viewer topping up big is overpaying.

    /onlyfans-models-sex-toys/ ·

    Told tippers to top up small on CAM4. Small is now the expensive end, by 37%.
    It was true then and is not now
  16. Not a cam site. A creator platform.

    /sinparty-review/ ·

    SinParty runs a cam grid and calls itself a live cam site. The page was titled for the wrong half.
    It was never true
  17. The only ladder here I have read at its own logged-in checkout, so the unit price is a fact rather than a report.

    /onlyfans-models-sex-toys/ ·

    Stripchat was the only checkout anybody had opened. Ten more were opened on 2 September 2026.
    It was true then and is not now
  18. Five top-up tiers, the cheapest at $9.99, and the ladder discounts properly as it goes: the biggest pack is 20% cheaper per unit than the smallest, the shape a ladder is supposed to have.

    /amateur-tv/ ·

    The cheapest tier is $2.99 on a card, the spread is 36%, and one rung runs backwards.
    It was never true
  19. Nobody has established what this platform's wallet unit is called.

    /amateur-tv/ ·

    The unit is called a coin. What is still unknown is what one buys.
    It was true then and is not now
  20. The credits themselves. Buyable with Visa, Mastercard or Maestro, and nothing else: no PayPal, no crypto, no vouchers.

    /babestation-review/ ·

    PayPal is on the top-up page and prices every tier the same as a card.Settled by: An archived capture of Babestation’s top-up page from 2022 showing which rails it offered then.
    I cannot tell which
  21. The VIP memberships. Silver, Diamond and Gold, at £9.99, £19.99 and £29.99 a month.

    /babestation-review/ ·

    The tiers were named in the wrong order. Diamond is the top tier, not the middle one.
    It was never true
  22. Buy CAM4's 150-token pack and you pay 12.7¢ a token. Buy the 300, the 550 or the 1,050 and you pay more per token than that.

    /cam-site-volume-discounts/ ·

    The opening example of the guide. None of those four tiers is on CAM4’s token page.
    It was true then and is not now
  23. Buy CAM4’s largest package and you pay $159.99 for 1,050 tokens. Buy seven of the 150-token package and you pay $132.93 for the same 1,050 tokens.

    /cam4-review/ ·

    Both baskets are gone: the tiers, the prices and the $27.06 saving the comparison produced.
    It was true then and is not now
  24. CAM4's token ladder does not get cheaper as you spend more, and that is not a rounding artefact. It is the largest pricing fault I have found on any platform on this site.

    /cam4-review/ ·

    The inversion is gone. Once CAM4’s $2.00 fee is counted the largest card tier is the cheapest.
    It was true then and is not now
  25. Nobody else in this dataset does this, and it contradicts something the CAM4 review on this site used to say about a crypto discount.

    /cam-site-payment-methods/ ·

    Crypto costs more than card on LiveJasmin and XLoveCam as well. CAM4 was not alone.
    It was never true
  26. And go elsewhere for a small first purchase. The bottom two rungs of that ladder are the same price per unit. Whatever you buy first, do not buy the 500 expecting a volume discount.

    /cams-com-review/ ·

    It told readers not to buy the 500. The 500 is the cheapest unit on the page.
    It was never true
  27. Buying two and a half times as much of this platform's wallet gets you very slightly less per unit than the smallest pack does.

    /cams-com-review/ ·

    The inversion described is not the one on the page. It is the largest pack that is the bad buy.
    It was never true
  28. The ladder that has been read, at the live checkout in May 2026, by the registry this dataset imports from rather than by me, is five tiers:

    /cams-com-review/ ·

    Five tiers imported from a registry. The wallet page sells four, in euros, with bonus units.
    It was never true
  29. The spread top to bottom is 45%: the smallest package costs 45% more per unit than the largest: a wide ladder, but not an unusual one. CamSoda's is 50%, Chaturbate's 39%, MyFreeCams' 39%.

    /cams-com-review/ ·

    A spread computed over a ladder that is not the one the checkout sells, against three that also moved.
    It was never true
  30. The cheapest way into CamSoda is the lowest entry price of any big token site, and it buys somewhere between fifty seconds and two minutes of a private show.

    /camsoda-review/ ·

    A superlative over other sites’ entry prices, none of which had been read at a checkout.
    It was never true
  31. The ladder is the cleanest here. Five tiers, every step cheaper than the last, no reversals and no traps

    /camsoda-review/ ·

    The five-tier ladder was a registry reading this page deferred to over its own seven-tier one.
    It was never true
  32. Chatmate charges $4.99 a minute, fixed, and its Gold is pegged to the dollar, so the rate is the price.

    /who-sets-cam-site-prices/ ·

    The $4.99 came from one article that contradicted itself two paragraphs apart. Neither half survived.
    It was never true
  33. Tokens themselves run $0.0790 to $0.1099 depending on which of the six tiers you buy

    /top-10-cam-sites/ ·

    Chaturbate’s card rail sells three tiers, not six, and the floor read $0.0800.
    It was never true
  34. CooMeet sells a recurring plan and does not publish what it costs. Its help pages will tell you how to cancel the renewal. They will not tell you what you agreed to pay.

    /paid-random-video-chat-cost/ ·

    CooMeet publishes its plan prices at its own purchase page, and labels the month a one-time purchase.
    It was true then and is not now
  35. CooMeet's smallest pack prices a minute at 50¢. Its largest prices one at 27.8¢, and the middle pack sits at 41.7¢. That is the widest spread on any ladder I hold, on a platform with only three rungs.

    /paid-random-video-chat-cost/ ·

    Three per-minute prices for three packs CooMeet does not sell, read off help copy rather than a basket.
    It was never true
  36. CooMeet's worst tier costs 80% more per minute than its best, the widest spread here

    /cam-site-volume-discounts/ ·

    CooMeet sells periods with minutes included, not three blocks of minutes. There was no such ladder.
    It was never true
  37. A unit pegged to the dollar. ImLive, SkyPrivate and SecretFriends sell credits at one credit to one dollar. Twenty dollars is twenty units. There is no tier to solve and nothing left stranded.

    /cam-sites-without-tokens/ ·

    ImLive was named in the pegged list and does not belong in it.
    It was never true
  38. ImLive's peg is real and its price is not one dollar. One credit is one dollar, exactly as advertised. Every one of its four packages then carries a 100% bonus, so a credit actually costs 50¢ to 60¢: a discount rather than a trick, and the only case in this dataset where the peg understates how cheap something is.

    /cam-sites-without-tokens/ ·

    ImLive declares no peg and its purchase page charges more than a dollar a credit, not less.
    It was never true
  39. Jerkmate's peg has a dissenting source. Two sources confirm one Gold is one dollar and a third quotes roughly thirteen cents. I have gone with the two, because the third's own per-minute figures only reconcile with everybody else's if its Gold is a dollar. An argument, not a checkout, and the figures on that review carry a dotted underline for it.

    /cam-sites-without-tokens/ ·

    The dissent is settled. Jerkmate sells no Gold packs, so the thirteen-cent source described nothing.
    It was true then and is not now
  40. LiveJasmin's cheapest top-up is $18 and does not divide into anything.

    /cam-sites-without-tokens/ ·

    The cheapest LiveJasmin top-up read $27.99 in September 2026, not $18.
    It was true then and is not now
  41. The premium end. Credits cost roughly six times what a token costs elsewhere, so a tip menu written in units reads very differently here.

    /onlyfans-models-sex-toys/ ·

    The multiple is more than ten, not roughly six, once both ladders are read at their checkouts.
    It was true then and is not now
  42. It is the only genuinely flat ladder in the dataset and, in its way, the most honest one on this page: it does not pretend the big pack is a favour.

    /cam-site-volume-discounts/ ·

    Two more flat ladders were read in September: Babestation’s, and XLoveCam’s card rail.
    It was true then and is not now
  43. MyFreeCams is the narrowest payment support in this dataset, an odd position for one of the oldest platforms on it.

    /cam-site-payment-methods/ ·

    MyFreeCams now takes PayPal and a bank wire alongside its card, so it is not the narrowest.
    It was true then and is not now
  44. even at the top of the ladder the saving is 12%, the shallowest ladder here.

    /cam-site-volume-discounts/ ·

    The 12% is right and "the shallowest here" is not, once the September ladders were read.
    It was true then and is not now
  45. Nothing on it is priced.

    /sinparty-review/ ·

    The live half is priced and always was: one house rate, a token ladder and two payment grids.
    It was never true
  46. Go elsewhere if you want the pricing to behave. Stripchat is the platform whose ladder I have actually read off its own logged-in checkout, and it does what a ladder should: seven tiers, near enough monotonic, with the one step worth taking clearly the third.

    /cam4-review/ ·

    Stripchat was the only checkout anybody had opened. Ten more were opened on 2 September 2026.
    It was true then and is not now
  47. Its prices are the only ones on this site I have read at a logged-in checkout.

    /chaturbate-review/ ·

    Stripchat was the only checkout anybody had opened. Ten more were opened on 2 September 2026.
    It was true then and is not now
  48. its prices are the only ones on this site I have read off a checkout myself

    /camera-prive-review/ ·

    Stripchat was the only checkout anybody had opened. Ten more were opened on 2 September 2026.
    It was true then and is not now
  49. Stripchat's is the only one read off its own logged-in checkout, and confirming it deleted three tiers that seven other sites publish and that do not exist at any price.

    /cam-site-volume-discounts/ ·

    Stripchat was the only checkout anybody had opened. Ten more were opened on 2 September 2026.
    It was true then and is not now
  50. Stripchat's largest tier, 2,350 tokens, is 8.51¢ at list price.

    /cam-site-volume-discounts/ ·

    The largest tier read on 13 September 2026 was 540 tokens at 9.26¢, not 2,350 at 8.51¢.Settled by: Following the "more tiers" link at Stripchat’s own token page on a funded account and recording what is behind it. That link is known to exist and has never been opened.
    I cannot tell which
  51. The 2,350-token tier, the biggest one that exists, is 8.51¢ at list price.

    /cam-site-welcome-offers/ ·

    "The biggest one that exists" was a claim about a ladder read without following its own link.Settled by: Following the "more tiers" link at Stripchat’s own token page on a funded account.
    I cannot tell which
  52. Xcams publishes the credit and not the rate. Five tiers run from just under 25 cents a credit at the €9.99 entry down to 20 cents at €199.99, a fifth cheaper at the top.

    /cam-sites-that-do-not-price-in-dollars/ ·

    Every figure moved: the entry is €15.99, the top €269.99, and a second dearer grid bills a phone.
    It was true then and is not now
  53. A private is £5.00 a minute if you topped up with £50 or less, and £3.33 a minute if you pressed the £100 button. Nothing about the show changes between those two figures.

    /cam-sites-that-do-not-price-in-dollars/ ·

    A bolded two-price claim built on the invented step, offered as the page’s worked example.
    It was never true
  54. A private on Babestation costs 50 credits a minute, and what that is in money depends entirely on which button you press on the top-up page.

    /babestation-review/ ·

    The house rate read 60 Babecoins a minute in September 2026. This page had published 50 since 2022.Settled by: An archived capture of a Babestation room tile or help page from 2022 showing the house rate of the day. Without one this stays open, because the only source for the 50 is this site.
    I cannot tell which
  55. At the entry tier that minute costs £5.00. At the £100 tier it costs £3.33.

    /babestation-review/ ·

    Two per-minute prices derived from a discount step that was the welcome offer counted twice.
    It was never true
  56. Babestation charges 50 credits a minute, and a credit is not one price. The first three buttons on the top-up page all price a credit at ten pence: £10, £20 and £50 buy 100, 200 and 500. The £100 button hands over 1,500 credits, which is a credit at just under seven pence, and the £200 button does the same and no more.

    /cam-sites-that-do-not-price-in-dollars/ ·

    The same invented discount step, on the guide that used Babestation as its worked example.
    It was never true
  57. It suits nobody who wants to compare. Everything here is in pounds, and a pounds price cannot be set against a dollars price without an exchange rate I refuse to bake into a table.

    /babestation-review/ ·

    The account that read this checkout was charged US dollars, not pounds.Settled by: A reading of the same top-up page from a UK account. One session settles it and nothing else will.
    I cannot tell which
  58. The first £50 buys no discount whatsoever. A credit is ten pence at the £10 tier, at the £20 tier and at the £50 tier, three times in a row. Then the £100 button hands over 1,500 credits for the price of 1,000 and the cost of a minute drops by a third, and the £200 button does exactly the same thing and no more. So the whole discount on this platform is one step, it happens at £100, and it is worth 33%.

    /babestation-review/ ·

    The 33% step at £100 was the first-purchase offer counted twice. The ladder has no step at all.
    It was never true
  59. Three of these ten have a "free chat" cell I have never checked: BongaCams, Streamate and Flirt4Free.

    /top-10-cam-sites/ ·

    BongaCams and Flirt4Free had both been recorded and neither sentence that cited this knew.
    It was true then and is not now
  60. Whether you can sit in those rooms without paying is a separate question, and it is one this site has not answered: rates.freeChat is null on BongaCams’ file and I am not going to promote a reputation to a fact.

    /bongacams-review/ ·

    The field was filled the same day. The refusal it describes had already been answered.
    It was true then and is not now
  61. I have never verified what the free layer here amounts to, and it remains one of the three unchecked free-chat cells on the top-ten page

    /streamate-review/ ·

    It was one of three and became the only one, because the other two had been read.
    It was true then and is not now
  62. Chaturbate is a quarter of the price to start and Stripchat is the one platform here whose ladder I have read off its own logged-in checkout.

    /secretfriends-review/ ·

    Stripchat was the only checkout anybody had opened. Ten more were opened on 2 September 2026.
    It was true then and is not now
  63. Stripchat is the one platform here whose ladder I have read off its own logged-in checkout, and BongaCams has the largest European roster I cover.

    /soulcams-review/ ·

    Stripchat was the only checkout anybody had opened. Ten more were opened on 2 September 2026.
    It was true then and is not now
  64. Stripchat is the one platform here whose ladder I have read off its own logged-in checkout.

    /fapchat/ ·

    Stripchat was the only checkout anybody had opened. Ten more were opened on 2 September 2026.
    It was true then and is not now
  65. Stripchat is the one platform here whose tiers I have read off its own logged-in checkout, and Streamate prices in dollars a minute before a show starts.

    /xlovecam-review/ ·

    Stripchat was the only checkout anybody had opened. Ten more were opened on 2 September 2026.
    It was true then and is not now
  66. Stripchat is the one platform whose ladder I have read off its own logged-in checkout, and Chaturbate publishes six tiers a reader can check.

    /amateur-tv/ ·

    Stripchat was the only checkout anybody had opened. Ten more were opened on 2 September 2026.
    It was true then and is not now
  67. The one platform here whose tiers were read off its own logged-in basket is priced in dollars, and confirming it deleted three tiers that seven other sites publish.

    /cam-sites-that-do-not-price-in-dollars/ ·

    Stripchat was the only checkout anybody had opened. Ten more were opened on 2 September 2026.
    It was true then and is not now
  68. This is the one platform on the site whose prices I have read off its own logged-in checkout rather than off somebody else's page about it.

    /top-10-cam-sites/ ·

    Stripchat was the only checkout anybody had opened. Ten more were opened on 2 September 2026.
    It was true then and is not now
  69. This is the only platform on this site whose prices I have read at its own logged-in checkout, and doing it also replaced the welcome offer everybody advertises with the one that is actually applied.

    /stripchat-review/ ·

    Stripchat was the only checkout anybody had opened. Ten more were opened on 2 September 2026.
    It was true then and is not now
  70. I would rather the page carried a price before it carried a commission. That order is the whole argument of this site, and easier to state than to keep, so it is stated here where it can be checked: if a button appears above before a number does, the order broke.

    /sinparty-review/ ·

    The affiliate link went on before any price did, which is the order this sentence promised not to use.
    It was true then and is not now
  71. hit the button below, make an account with your best email, confirm it and you’ll get 10 free BongaCams tokens straight away

    /bongacams-review/ ·

    welcomeBonus has been null throughout, so the page promised a grant the dataset does not hold.Settled by: Registering a new account, confirming the email, and looking at the token balance before any purchase. If 10 tokens are there, it goes in welcomeBonus with the date; if they are not, this becomes a retraction of a claim that was wrong when written. Nothing short of that settles it, because the claim is specifically about money not changing hands. That is the same test recorded against Stripchat’s withdrawn 50-token offer.
    I cannot tell which
  72. Make sure to click the links on this article or the picture below and get your free 50 Cam4 tokens now and start chatting with some of the most beautiful girls on the planet live on camera.

    /cam4-review/ ·

    Promised free tokens four times over a welcomeBonus that has been null throughout.
    It was never true
  73. Paying with crypto will save you some money if you decide to pay for private shows and Cam2Cam and tipping.

    /cam4-review/ ·

    The only crypto ladder here points the other way: crypto costs 18.4% more per token than the card rail.Settled by: One logged-in session at CAM4's token checkout, reading the card ladder and the crypto ladder in the same sitting, with the transaction fee noted on each. That settles the direction today. Whether it was true in 2022 is a separate question and probably unanswerable, because my own review of that date priced only the card rail, so there is no crypto figure from the period to compare against, and I would rather record that than guess at it.
    I cannot tell which
  74. The average token price is between a range from $2 to $6 per minute which is quite ok overall but worth it

    /cams-com-review/ ·

    Calls a per-minute rate a token price, and the file holds no private rate at all.Settled by: Open two or three rooms and read the private rate off them. That settles the rate model first, meaning whether every performer shows the same price or their own, and a room sample after it produces a median. Both need an account, because Cams.com does not show prices to a logged-out visitor.
    I cannot tell which
  75. the fact that some shows start from 6 tokens per minute is definitely something to consider as a big thumb up

    /camsoda-review/ ·

    Nothing here supports 6 tokens a minute. The published band is 60 to 120.Settled by: A room sample: thirty private rates read off the default grid, recorded into _audit/rates/camsoda.csv with the date and the count, then ingested. That produces a median rather than a band and would show directly whether anything on the platform is priced near 6 tokens a minute. Whether such rooms existed in 2022 is a separate question that no sample taken today can answer.
    I cannot tell which
  76. All you need to do is to click on the links in this article, use your best email and confirm it to get your $10 free ImLive credit right now.

    /imlive-review/ ·

    welcomeBonus has been null throughout, so the page promised a grant the dataset does not hold.
    It was never true
  77. Buying credits is very simple and secure and they are accepting credit cards and cryptocurrency. All the top credit cards are accepted and if you buy with crypto you will get an additional discount

    /mydirtyhobby-review/ ·

    The file holds one ladder on one rail and no crypto ladder at all, discounted or otherwise.Settled by: One logged-in session at the MyDirtyHobby top-up page, reading the tier prices with a card selected and then with crypto selected, in the same sitting. If the crypto column is cheaper it is a real finding and belongs in packages with a method rail, exactly as CAM4 carries its two. If it is not, this becomes a retraction of a claim that was wrong when written.
    I cannot tell which
  78. the credit card processor is safe and encrypted and secure as well, you will never be charged if you don’t buy tokens yourself

    /myfreecams-review/ ·

    I have never audited a payment processor. It is a claim about what I knew, and it was not true.
    It was never true
  79. on average a model wants 20 tokens per minute for a private show

    /soulcams-review/ ·

    Two different averages for the same quantity, four paragraphs apart on one page.Settled by: Open thirty rooms and write down the private rate on each. SoulCams shows the rate on the room tile, so this needs an account but no purchase, and it produces a median rather than an average of two guesses.
    I cannot tell which

79 sentences · generated from retractedClaims on each platform file, and from page-retractions.json for a page's own sentences

Why this page cannot quietly go out of date

Every row is stored on the platform's own data file next to the field it is about, and this page is generated from those files at build time. Restore a withdrawn figure without deleting its record and the build fails. What none of that can do is find the errors. That is still a person opening a checkout. See what I have verified for the other half: not what came down, but what was never up.

Seen a figure the checkout does not agree with? Send it to hello@camsite.org. If it fails the check it lands in the table above, dated. What to include.