- 100$9.99$0.0999+24%
- 300$27.99$0.0933+16%
- 600$53.99$0.0900+12%
- 1,300$109.99$0.0846+5%
- 2,800$224.99$0.0804best value
5 tiers · priced in USD · cheapest at 2,800 units · checked 2026-08-05
5 tiers · priced in USD · cheapest at 2,800 units · checked 2026-08-05
Good
Not good
Every Amateur.TV top-up tier is priced per unit on the package comparison.
Nobody has established what this platform’s wallet unit is called. Until somebody does, five recorded top-up prices can be compared against each other and against nothing else.
Amateur.TV is a Spanish and southern-European site with a genuine amateur
roster. It is also the platform in this directory I can tell you least about, so this page is short.
Five top-up tiers, the cheapest at $9.99, and the ladder discounts properly as it goes: the biggest pack is 20% cheaper per unit than the smallest, the shape a ladder is supposed to have. They are in the table above.
What is missing is the thing that would make any of it usable:
Amateur.TV does
not publish what its wallet unit is called or what one of them buys. Without
that, the tiers can be compared against each other and against nothing else. I
cannot tell you what a minute costs here, and I cannot put this platform in the
minutes calculator or rank it against anything on price.
There is a second problem with the ladder, worth stating plainly. Those
five tiers came from a single third-party import. Until August 2026 the same five
appeared on
Xcams’ file as well, which read like two sources agreeing. It was
one import landing on two files. Xcams’ copy has since been withdrawn, because my
own 2022 review of Xcams contradicts it from first hand with a different ladder
in euros. Which platform that importer was actually looking at is not knowable
from here. Amateur.TV keeps the tiers only because nothing contradicts them, and
a Spanish-run platform with a dollar-denominated ladder is worth doubting on
exactly the grounds that sank the Xcams copy.
The amateur framing is real rather than a marketing category. The performers are mostly not full-time professionals with production setups, the rooms look like rooms, and Spanish is the working language of the site even though the interface translates.
Free chat exists, and worth noticing is that this is one of only two things
about
Amateur.TV I can state without a caveat, which is fewer than I would like. The other is that the ladder has
five rungs. Everything else on this page is either missing or borrowed.
Almost everything. The wallet unit, which blocks the rest. The billing model. Whether free chat is metered. Any private rate at all. The payment rails. And whether the five tiers describe this platform rather than a different one.
The founding year came from the same registry as the tiers, and records the operating company rather than the site.
I rate it 7.0, and that score was formed before any of the pricing landed. It reflects the roster and the amateur focus, not the value, because I cannot compute the value. Once somebody opens the checkout, the score gets looked at again.
Spanish-speaking amateur performers specifically, and a willingness to buy without knowing what a unit is worth. A narrow group, and I am not going to pretend otherwise.
Skip it if you are comparing on price, because nothing on this site can help you here. Stripchat is the one platform whose ladder I have read off its own logged-in checkout, and Chaturbate publishes six tiers a reader can check.
Amateur.TV's package tiers are priced per unit on the package comparison page. Its per-minute rate is not verified yet, so here is what is still missing.